Check Your Pandit mode

Paste any reading. We grade every claim. Green, amber, red.

A reading from another astrologer, an old PDF report, a screenshot from a competitor app — paste it in. Claude Opus 4.7 extracts every distinct claim, checks each one against your live chart and the relevant classical texts, and returns a colour-coded verdict per claim with the textual basis.

Model: Claude Opus 4.7Latency: ~20 secondsMax tier

Try Check Pandit mode See pricing

Best for

You got a reading elsewhere and want a sober second opinion. Or you are comparing two pandits before booking.

What goes in. What comes out.

What goes in

›A pasted reading (or text from a screenshot — paste the text).
›Your saved chart context (if the source reading is about you).
›Optional: the name of the source pandit / app for the bibliography.

What comes out

›A claim-by-claim audit table.
›Each claim tagged GREEN (textually grounded), AMBER (defensible interpretation), RED (not supported / contradicted by the texts).
›For RED claims — the citation that contradicts the original reading.
›A summary verdict — "X of Y claims grounded; Z notable concerns".

Under the hood

The exact pipeline this mode runs.

Claim extractionOpus 4.7 with structured-output format

Per-claim retrievalTargeted RAG against the relevant lineage

Verdict assignmentGreen / Amber / Red with cited basis

Audit tableSaved to your journal · exportable PDF

Three worked examples

The kind of question this mode is built for, and the kind of reply you would actually get.

Question

[Pasted reading] "Saturn in your 7th house guarantees a divorce after 8 years of marriage. You must perform 108 Shani mantras every Saturday to avoid this."

Two claims, both RED. Claim 1 — "guarantees divorce": no Parashari authority supports an unconditional outcome from a single placement; BPHS 11.4 itself frames Saturn in the 7th as deliberative, dependent on Saturn’s dignity, the 7th lord’s strength, and the timing of the dasha. Claim 2 — "108 mantras to avoid": Saturn mantras can be supportive (Phaladeepika 12), but framing them as a single guaranteed mitigation is not classical practice. The reading reads as fear-based; a qualified consult would express the same data far more carefully.

BPHS 11.4Phaladeepika 12.3

Question

[Pasted reading] "Your Mars in the 10th house is excellent for a career in the armed forces, surgery, or engineering. You should consider one of these fields."

One claim, GREEN. Mars in the 10th has digbala (directional strength) per BPHS 7.32, and Saravali 25.4 explicitly lists military, surgery and engineering as the karaka-aligned vocations. The original reading is textually grounded.

BPHS 7.32Saravali 25.4

Question

[Pasted reading] "You will have three children — two boys and one girl — born between 2028 and 2034."

One claim, RED. Classical Jyotish does not support specific-number, specific-sex predictions for unborn children — what BPHS 9 actually says is conditional indication based on the 5th lord, the 5th house, Jupiter, and the dasha context. Specific gender predictions in particular are framed as probabilistic, not certain. A reading this specific is asserting confidence the texts do not support.

BPHS 9Saravali 38.4

When to use Check Pandit

• You got a reading elsewhere and want a sober second opinion.
• You are comparing two pandits before booking one.
• You want to fact-check a Reddit / WhatsApp astrology forward.

When NOT to use Check Pandit

• You want the original reading interpreted in plainer English (use Normal).
• You are starting from scratch with no prior reading (use Deep Research or Max).

The other three modes

Same chat. Different depth.

Free

Normal

Single-topic questions, daily readings, follow-ups, basic interpretive work.

See Normal mode →

Pro

Deep Research

Career trajectory, multi-year dasha analysis, life-arc questions, anything that warrants a brief instead of a chat reply.

See Deep Research mode →

Max

Max Council

Big life decisions — marriage, surgery, business launch, major relocation. Where you want every classical school weighing in.

See Max mode →

FAQ

Will it always disagree with the original reading?

No. When a reading is well-grounded the audit will mostly return GREEN with notes. The audit can also catch when a reading is right for the wrong reason — an AMBER tag.

Can I check a reading not about me?

Yes — tell the mode whose chart the reading is about (or paste the chart details) and it will audit against that chart.

Is this rude to the original pandit?

It is not framed as a personal critique. The audit grades the claims against the classical texts, not the messenger. The output is presented to you privately — what you do with it is your call.

What if I want to act on the original reading anyway?

That is your right. Check Your Pandit gives you the data; it does not make the decision for you. Many readings come back with a mix of green and amber — there is room for legitimate interpretation.

Try Check Pandit on your own chart

Free Kundli first, then ask Panditji anything in Check Pandit mode.

Generate my Kundli See pricing